By Jennifer Dorsett
Field Editor
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) granted temporary spectrum access to wireless internet service providers across the country. This will help serve rural communities’ increased broadband needs during the COVID-19 pandemic.
FCC officials issued special temporary authorization to 33 wireless internet service providers. The companies may use the lower 45 megahertz of the 5.9 gigahertz (Ghz) band for a period of 60 days to help cope with increased bandwidth demand while more people work and learn at home.
“Like everybody else, rural Americans are facing an increased need for broadband service as more and more workers, students and families stay home during this national emergency,” FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said in a statement. “Fixed wireless broadband providers deliver this service for many communities, especially those hardest for other providers to reach. Giving them access to the 5.9 GHz band will help them meet their customers’ needs during these challenging times.”
Since 1999, the 75 megahertz of spectrum in the 5.9 Ghz band was reserved exclusively for a technology known as Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSCR), intended for transportation safety and vehicle-related communications.
Pai said last November DSCR had evolved slowly and isn’t widely deployed.
FCC decided in December it would free up the lower portion of the 5.9 Ghz band for unlicensed use, such as fixed-wireless services offered by internet providers.
American Farm Bureau Federation, of which Texas Farm Bureau is a member, has long advocated for increased broadband access in rural areas. According to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) data, 29 percent of farms have no internet access, a fact which AFBF says is unacceptable.
Measures taken by federal and state governments during the COVID-19 pandemic, including social distancing orders and shelter-in-place requirements, underscore the need for reliable, high-speed access for all Americans.
Communities in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin and West Virginia are expected to be helped through the FCC’s temporary authorizations.
In Texas, four companies that serve more than 75 counties were granted temporary access.
Counties serviced under the authorizations include: Archer, Austin, Bell, Bosque, Brown, Burleson, Callahan, Chambers, Clay, Coke, Coleman, Collin, Colorado, Comanche, Concho, Cooke, Coryell, Dallas, Delta, Denton, Eastland, Ellis, Erath, Falls, Fannin, Franklin, Freestone, Galveston, Grayson, Grimes, Hamilton, Henderson, Hill, Hood, Hopkins, Hunt, Irion, Jack, Jefferson, Johnson, Kaufman, Lamar, Lampasas, Lee, Leon, Limestone, Mason, McCulloch, McLennan, Menard, Milam, Mills, Montague, Navarro, Palo Pinto, Parker, Rains, Red River, Robertson, Rockwall, Runnels, San Saba, Shackelford, Smith, Somervell, Stephens, Tarrant, Taylor, Throckmorton, Tom Green, Van Zandt, Waller, Washington, Wichita, Williamson, Wise and Wood.
“This is a promising step toward getting rural Texans the internet access they need, especially during this difficult time when so many of us are working and learning at home,” Texas Farm Bureau National Legislative Director Laramie Adams said. “We’re hopeful this may pave the way for some permanent changes that lead to better connectivity for all Texans when things get back to normal.”
Why not Hidalgo County?
I See Dallas and Tarrant counties listed but not my County, Fisher which is a TRUE rural area way underserved by internet service when I think of Dallas and Tarrant and many other on that list THEY are urban jungles.
Perhaps the FCC should review their maps or maybe even do a flyover before making decisions.
Lyndon Heffernan
1107 E Sammy Baugh
Rotan Texas 79546
Great! It should be permanent and not just 90 days!!! Thank you!
Why is this just temporary? We need better access to high speed internet with greater bandwidth all the time. We have the same needs as everyone else!
What about Houston county
We listed all the counties FCC had listed. If you have questions, you can contact your provider and see if they have any information.
How can we find out if our provider is participating. With two college Son’s returning home, our service is not fast enough to allow them to do their assignments. One is a Senior Computer Engineering student, the other is a Computer Science/Computer Information student; they require a lot of data and fast connections. Information on what companies are offering these services would be helpful. I contacted our current provider two weeks ago. They could not help. My oldest Son was forced to return to San Antonio to be able to do his assignments. Instead of being home in the country away from the VIRUS, he’s back in the middle of a major city. Needing high speed internet, NOW!
I believe you can reach out to your provider and ask if they are participating.
Why are so many actual rural counties left off the list? Live in Uvalde County where it is very hard to get good internet service out in the country and Uvalde County is one of many not listed on the list. How can this oversight be rectified?
My bill with AT&T went from 296.42 a month to 1157.82 this month. Me and my wife are working from home +2 grandkids are doing their homework. That’s unacceptable.
Please add Edwards County! Thank you in advance.
I live in Robertson county. I have nothing except my phone. The nearest wifi i 7 miles in town using city hall or police.
This is unacceptable.
My guess is that many rural counties are not included on this list is that there is no wireless service provider operating in those cointies, or if there providers in those counties, they did not apply for the extra bandwidth.
If no one is willing to offer the service, this expansion does not help.
PLEASE ADD GILLESPIE AND BLANCO COUNTY
DeWitt County is number 4 in the State for cattle production and not on the list? How many cattle in Tarrant County? Under the table business here.
I just wish they would actually help with rural areas. I see areas there that get great internet while true rural set out here paying for Hughes net with download speeds before covid19 of .08 MPS . No way we could work or school from home.
Rural Texans share of TWO TRILLION dollars will provide broadband for every county! Oh but that’s been promised by Washington for over 10 years now. It don’t pass the smell test. Where are our rural Representatives on this?
I
Posted two comments this afternoon but they are not shown here. There was a message stating my comments had been received but were in “modulation “ and would appear shortly. Where are they? Thanks.
Why doesn’t Consolidated Communications provide internet services in Pattison, TX.
I supposedly have an extended service but we only get 1 mg. They say it not enough people in the country to merit better service for that area. How can we get better service; internet is a tool to be and stay relevent.
Service in rural Caldwell county is horrible at best. How can we get fair service in our area ?