By Jennifer Dorsett
Field Editor

The land lies dormant, waiting for the promise of spring. Stalks from last year’s cotton crop bend slightly in the breeze. In the heart of the Jim Ned Valley, just outside Abilene, all is well on this chilly day. Except one thing.

A huge swath of land has been ripped apart. The rich red dirt looks almost like a wound in the landscape. When viewed from above, it appears to be a wide dirt road.

But this road doesn’t lead anywhere except heartache and frustration. Three different pipeline companies have claimed eminent domain and wreaked havoc on Bill and Lynne Keys’ land for the past two years.

And there’s no foreseeable end in the future.

Bill trekked across the muddy, rutted path, stooping to pick up construction trash as he talked.

“We have four lines coming across our property,” he said. “It’s just been a real source of frustration. We know we’ve been taken advantage of.”

When Bill and his wife, Lynne, bought her grandmother’s property in Tuscola 21 years ago, they never imagined they’d be in this situation. Instead, they dreamed of gathering families and preserving memories.

The property has been in Lynne’s family for three generations and is fast approaching the century mark. Her grandparents raised cotton, wheat, cattle, pigs, chickens and seven children on the 157-acre farm.

“They settled here in 1924,” Lynne said. “There was no electricity, no running water. It was a dryland farm, and my mom was the baby of the seven children. They’d pick cotton, do whatever it took.”

Lynne and her twin sister, Gwynne, grew up helping on the farm.

Fond memories of family, hard work and comradery abound for both women.

Now, the Keys enjoy having the next generations visit the farm. Bill and Lynne have a daughter, son-in-law and two grandchildren. Sharing the land and her own childhood memories with them is special, Lynne said.

But in 2016, that all changed.

An old pipeline delivers new troubles

It started when Atmos Energy approached the Keys. A landman representing the company said the Texas Railroad Commission had ordered Atmos to restore an old natural gas pipeline because it was too corroded.

Lynne knew her uncles negotiated a pipeline easement sometime in the ‘70s. What she didn’t know is how badly her farm was about to be damaged.

The landman told the Keys that Atmos just needed to fix about 50 to 75 feet of pipe. But an inspection revealed three miles would have to be completely replaced.

“They did a little check to see if they could just seal it,” Lynne said. “Well, that didn’t work for them, so they came back in 2017, and they told us, ‘We’re coming. We’re going to put in a new pipeline. Sit back and take it.’”

The company asked to use more land than the original easement allowed. It was explained to the Keys as temporary workspace to build a bore hole and assemble pipe. They were told by the landman that boring the new pipeline section would be beneficial because it would keep their pasture in the same condition and would not damage or kill trees.

“We dealt with about three landmen. Then one finally scribbled something on a Google map,” Lynne said. “That’s all we’ve had to hold them to.”

The “temporary workspace” effectively became a highway for the bore project. Heavy machinery crossed their property daily. And the equipment operators, Lynne said, seemed to be oblivious to the fact that it was private property, excavating and dumping debris wherever it was convenient.

And the pasture and trees the company was supposed to preserve? Destroyed.

“Unfortunately, they utilized both of the wetland areas in our pasture, and proceeded to abuse the property, severely contaminate some areas, do things without our permission,” Lynne said. “Totally misrepresenting what they were going to do, and then doing whatever they wanted to do based on their needs of the day.”

The company dumped 21 truckloads of bore mud containing bentonite and other chemicals into a small stock tank on the east side of their property. They also blocked the Keys’ tenant farmer access to his fields, causing a complete wheat crop loss in 2017 and a partial cotton crop loss in 2018.

“What we were told was one thing, and what actually happened was another thing,” Bill said.

It has now been a year-and-a-half si